ADR-088 ActifActive contract

Agentica logo colors formalized (retroactive)

DateDate
2026-07-22
DécideursDecision makers
Guilherme Negreiros — Design System Lead

Context

scripts/validate-contracts.js (ADR-086) flags semantic.color.brand.logo-black and semantic.color.brand.logo-gray as citing "decision": "logo-identity" — a value that doesn't match the ADR-XXX shape every other decision field in the token system uses.

Investigation found this wasn't a stand-in for an existing ADR: no ADR ever formally established the logo colors. ADR-024 defines the brand *palette* (Teal/Rose/Bordeaux) but does not mention the logo's black (#000000) / gray (#6B7280) values at all. Per .claude/skills/pipelines/adr-triggers.md, adding a new color is one of the changes that always requires an ADR ("New color palette" row) — this one was added without one.

tokens/primitives.json's own primitive.color.brand._readme already states the governance intent informally: *"Agentica logo colors — fixed brand values, do not modify without Design approval. Only these brand tokens are allowed to reference #000000 and #6B7280 directly."* This ADR makes that existing, already-enforced intent official instead of introducing a new rule.

Decision

1. primitive.color.brand.black (#000000) and primitive.color.brand.gray (#6B7280) are the two officially reserved colors of the Agentica wordmark/logo — the only primitives allowed to hold a literal #000000/#6B7280 value, per the existing _readme note. 2. semantic.color.brand.logo-black / logo-gray are the semantic layer over them, reserved for logo/wordmark/brand-icon use only (doNotUse: regular text, page background, any generic UI component — already encoded in $extensions.doNotUse, unchanged by this ADR). 3. tokens/semantic.json's decision field for both tokens is updated from "logo-identity" to "ADR-088", resolving the validate-contracts.js warning. 4. Any future change to these two specific values (not new logo-adjacent tokens, the values themselves) requires Principal Designer approval, consistent with the _readme's existing "do not modify without Design approval" note — this ADR does not loosen that.

Rejected alternatives

AlternativeReason for rejection
Leave "decision": "logo-identity" as a documented, permanent exception to the ADR-shaped conventionWould mean this project's own trigger matrix ("new color → ADR required") doesn't actually apply to every color — better to close the real gap than carve out an exception for it
Fold this into ADR-024 (amend the brand palette ADR)ADR-024 is ✅ Active and, per decisions/README.md's own rule, "immutable once active — any modification = a new ADR"; amending it would violate that rule

Consequences

disappears — every decision field is now ADR-shaped and resolves to a real file.

correctly-enforced constraint, it does not alter it.

← ADR-087 ADR-089 →